Episode 66: Can You DIG It?

March 27, 2018

Welcome back for another episode of the National Security Law Podcast, with Professors Steve Vladeck and Bobby Chesney.  It has been another not-at-all slow week.  On tap for today:

  1. The CLOUD Act: It’s now the law of the land.  We will go into the law’s particulars next week, but for now we do want to address what passage means for the pending Supreme Court case involving the government’s attempt to force Microsoft to produce data stored in Ireland.  Vacate-and-remand, dismiss as improvidently granted, or full steam ahead?
  2. Military Commissions: Never a dull moment with the commissions!  Judge Pohl has received dueling declarations from Secretary Mattis and former Convening Authority Harvey Rishikoff and Legal Advisor Gary Brown regarding the firing of the latter two, and a hard question looms regarding whether an evidentiary hearing will follow.  Meanwhile, the Court of Military Commission Review has sent questions to, well, everyone, including Judge Spath.  Judge Spath responded quickly, and we review all of it.
  3. The meaning of “terrorism”: In connection with the recent Austin bombings, the question of what counts as “terrorism” both as a legal and a policy matter has arisen once again.  Should there be a new federal crime of terrorism?  State laws to that effect?  Is the status quo fine?  How should journalists talk about violence that causes fear in the community when it is not entirely clear why the perpetrator is carrying out such acts?
  4. John Bolton and law: A quick note on the new National Security Advisor’s legal and policy orientation

And then there’s the really important stuff: The pros and cons of … fantasy sports in general, and fantasy baseball in particular!

 

Comments are closed.

National Security Law Podcast © 2017