There’s no shortage of news this week, but comparatively little of it is national security law news, and so we are back with a fresh deep dive episode. For better or worse, it’s our longest…
Episode 79: It’s a Girl!
- June 20, 2018
- Tagged as: 9/11, Administrative Procedure Act, al Alawqi, al Awlaki, al Awlaqi, Alien Tort Statute, APA, AQIM, ATS, AUMF, Benghazi, CACI, Carpenter, CIA, Dalmazzi, Doe v. Mattis, DOJ, Feinstein Amendment, GTMO, Guantanamo, habeas, habeas corpus, Hamidullin, Hirabayashi, Iraq, Jesner, Judge Bates, Judge Brinkema, Judge Chutkan, Judge Collyer, Judge Pohl, Judge Spath, Kareem, Khatallah, Lee Amendment, military commission, National Security Division, NDAA, NSD, Ocasio-Martinez, OIG Report, Political Question, SCOTUS, Space Force, Syria, Travel Ban, Vault 7, wikileaks, Zaidan
Before getting into the run of this week’s show: Congratulations to Steve and Karen on the birth of their daughter!!! Meanwhile, in the wild wacky world of national security law, what a week it was. …
Episode 75: I Hereby Demand, & Tomorrow Will Officially Order, That You Listen to This Podcast
- May 22, 2018
- Tagged as: al Alwi, Al Nashiri, al-Bihani, al-Shimari, Alien Tort Statute, ATS, CACI, CMCR, Doe v. Mattis, Enemy Combatant, GTMO, Guantanamo, habeas corpus, Hamidullin, IIPA, Intelligence Identities Protection Act, Jesner v. Arab Bank, Judge Chutkan, Military Commissions, one-hit wonder, POW, spath, Trumplandia
Never a slow week in this business… This week we’ve got breakdowns and debates over some familiar topics: Military Commissions: The convoluted proceedings in the al-Nashiri prosecution became a bit less tangled this week, as…
Episode 53: Tanks, Bombs, Bombs, and Guns
- January 9, 2018
- Tagged as: 702, ACLU, ACLU v. Mattis, AQI, AUMF, Breyer, Dalmazzi, Doe v. Mattis, Dual-Office Holding, Enemy Combatant, FISA, FISC, FISCOR, Golden Globes, habeas, habeas corpus, Hamdi, Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, Marbury v. Madison, NFL, Non-Detention Act, O'Connor, Pitch Perfect, Pitch Perfect 3, surveillance
In this week’s episode, Professors Chesney and Vladeck take on three sets of issues under the national security law heading: ACLU v. Mattis (the US citizen enemy combatant case): Since the last episode, the government…
Episode 51: Temporary, Immediate, and Unmonitored Access to this Podcast
- December 27, 2017
- Tagged as: ACLU v. Mattis, Carpenter, Enemy Combatant, habeas, habeas corpus, human rights, IEEPA, interlocutory appeal, Judge Chutkan, Magnitsky Act, Munaf, national emergency, National Security Law, NSA, privacy, Red Dawn, sanctions, Section 702, Sergei Magnitsky, Snowden, standing, Star Wars, surveillance, The Siege, Travel Ban
Well, 2017 is almost done. No doubt there are a few more kicks-in-the-pants on the way before it’s all said and done, but hey, we can at least offer you one final episode of this…
Episode 50: The Big Chill
- December 19, 2017
- Tagged as: Abu Khattala, ACLU v. Mattis, Benghazi, Executive Privilege, Fourth Amendment, GSA, habeas, habeas corpus, Langhoffer, material support, movie soundtracks, Mueller, Presidential Transition Act, Section 702, Special Counsel, Stored Communications Act, terrorism prosecution, Trump
Are your other podcasts letting you down by taking a holiday break? Never fear, National Security Law Podcast is here! With two host who would much rather be podcasting than grading exams, you are assured…
Episode 49: Around the Horn With Interrogation, Detention, Prosecution, and Targeting
- December 12, 2017
- Tagged as: 2001 AUMF, 2002 AUMF, ACLU v. Mattis, Akayed Ullah, Authorization for Use of Military Force, Bill Castle, Enemy Combatant, GTMO, Guantanamo, habeas, habeas corpus, Hambali, interrogation, jurisdictional discovery, Lindsey Graham, Military Commissions, Miranda, movies, national security, National Security Law, presentment, public safety exception, Quarles, Somalia
In this week’s episode, Professors Steve Vladeck and Bobby Chesney pick up the thread on a handful of familiar issues, and introduce a few new ones as well. Interrogation: Their first topic is a blend, actually:…
Episode 40: It’s a Conspiracy
- October 10, 2017
- Tagged as: ACLU v. Mattis, Bahlul, Conspiracy, D.C. Circuit, Data Protection Commissioner, Doe v. Mattis, Enemy Combatant, Facebook Ireland, habeas corpus, inchoate charge, Laws of War, Military Commissions, military detention, Nashiri, National Security Presidential Memorandum, NSPM 7, Schrems, Section 70s, Steve Rushin, Sting-Ray Afternoons, Stingray Afternoons
In this week’s episode, Professors Chesney and Vladeck zero in on four recent developments involving law and national security. First, they explore the Supreme Court’s decision not to review the splintered decision of the en…
brought to you by..
