Tag: ACLU v. Mattis

• Uncategorized

Episode 58: Is It Treason Not to Clap For This Podcast?

• February 6, 2018
• Tagged as: #mehmo, #releasethememo, ACLU v. Mattis, al Darbi, Carter Page, Convening Authority, Dirty Dancing, Doe v. Mattis, Eli Manning, FISA, FISC, FOIA, Gary Brown, GTMO, Guantanamo, Han Solo, Harvey Rishikof, House Rule 11(g), Judge Chutkan, Justin Timberlake, Kessel Run, Kiyemba, Kiyemba II, Military Commissions, Munaf, National Security Law, Nunes, Schiff, Super Bowl, Tom Brady, Treason, Trump, Valentine

Sorry that football season is over?  Lucky for you, the National Security Law Podcast has no offseason!  And lucky for your co-hosts, the world keeps generating new topics for conversation and debate.  This week, Professors Vladeck…

• Uncategorized

Episode 55: #ReleaseThePodcast

• January 23, 2018
• Tagged as: #releasethememo, 702, 702 renewal, about collection, abouts collection, ACLU, ACLU v. Mattis, Anti-Deficiency Act, Appropriations, Carter Page, CFAA, Chesney, Chutkan, cybersecurity, Doe v. Mattis, Enemy Combatant, extradition, FISA, FISA Amendments Reform Act, FISC, Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, Fourth Amendment, Iraq, John Doe, Judge Chutkan, Max Boot, Minimization, Mueller, Munaf, National Security Act, Nunes, REAL ID Act, SCOTUS, Section 702, Supreme Court, Syria, Title I, to/from collection, Travel Ban, Travel Ban 3.0, Valentine, Vladeck, warrant

Happy anniversary, y’all!  It’s been one full year since we launched this podcast, and we are very grateful for all our listeners.  Here’s hoping there is *less* to discuss in our second year! This week,…

• Uncategorized

Episode 53: Tanks, Bombs, Bombs, and Guns

• January 9, 2018
• Tagged as: 702, ACLU, ACLU v. Mattis, AQI, AUMF, Breyer, Dalmazzi, Doe v. Mattis, Dual-Office Holding, Enemy Combatant, FISA, FISC, FISCOR, Golden Globes, habeas, habeas corpus, Hamdi, Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, Marbury v. Madison, NFL, Non-Detention Act, O'Connor, Pitch Perfect, Pitch Perfect 3, surveillance

In this week’s episode, Professors Chesney and Vladeck take on three sets of issues under the national security law heading: ACLU v. Mattis (the US citizen enemy combatant case): Since the last episode, the government…

• Uncategorized

Episode 51: Temporary, Immediate, and Unmonitored Access to this Podcast

• December 27, 2017
• Tagged as: ACLU v. Mattis, Carpenter, Enemy Combatant, habeas, habeas corpus, human rights, IEEPA, interlocutory appeal, Judge Chutkan, Magnitsky Act, Munaf, national emergency, National Security Law, NSA, privacy, Red Dawn, sanctions, Section 702, Sergei Magnitsky, Snowden, standing, Star Wars, surveillance, The Siege, Travel Ban

Well, 2017 is almost done.  No doubt there are a few more kicks-in-the-pants on the way before it’s all said and done, but hey, we can at least offer you one final episode of this…

• Uncategorized

Episode 50: The Big Chill

• December 19, 2017
• Tagged as: Abu Khattala, ACLU v. Mattis, Benghazi, Executive Privilege, Fourth Amendment, GSA, habeas, habeas corpus, Langhoffer, material support, movie soundtracks, Mueller, Presidential Transition Act, Section 702, Special Counsel, Stored Communications Act, terrorism prosecution, Trump

Are your other podcasts letting you down by taking a holiday break?  Never fear, National Security Law Podcast is here! With two host who would much rather be podcasting than grading exams, you are assured…

• Uncategorized

Episode 49: Around the Horn With Interrogation, Detention, Prosecution, and Targeting

• December 12, 2017
• Tagged as: 2001 AUMF, 2002 AUMF, ACLU v. Mattis, Akayed Ullah, Authorization for Use of Military Force, Bill Castle, Enemy Combatant, GTMO, Guantanamo, habeas, habeas corpus, Hambali, interrogation, jurisdictional discovery, Lindsey Graham, Military Commissions, Miranda, movies, national security, National Security Law, presentment, public safety exception, Quarles, Somalia

In this week’s episode, Professors Steve Vladeck and Bobby Chesney pick up the thread on a handful of familiar issues, and introduce a few new ones as well. Interrogation:  Their first topic is a blend, actually:…

• Uncategorized

Episode 47: Donuts and Depth Charges

• November 28, 2017
• Tagged as: ACLU v. Mattis, Baker, Carpenter, CFPB, contempt, Dodd-Frank, drone strike, Enemy Combatant, Executive Power, Federal Vacancies Reform Act of 1998, GTMO, Jaber, John Merryman, Military Commissions, Mulvaney, National Security Law, Political Question, Red October, Rishikoff, spath, standing, Torture Victim Protection Act, Travel Ban, Trump, TVPA

And…they’re back!  Fresh off of Thanksgiving, Professors Chesney and Vladeck are (all too) fired up to discuss the latest national security law news (not to mention a bunch of stuff that just isn’t relevant to…

• Uncategorized

Episode 43: Unseal this Podcast!

• October 31, 2017
• Tagged as: ACLU v. Mattis, Al Nashiri, AUMF, Gates, indictment, Manafort, Military Commissions, Mueller, Mustafa al-Imam, Niger, Papadapolous, Pardon, sensitive military operations, SMOs, Trump

It’s been a busy week in national security law!  In Episode 43, Professors Chesney and Vladeck take on: Mueller-Time: Indictments against Manafort and Gates, and an even-more important plea deal. ACLU v. Mattis and the…

• Uncategorized

Episode 42: The Magic Bullet Travel Ban(d)

• October 24, 2017
• Tagged as: ACLU v. Mattis, Article 2(4), Article III, AUMF, Bowe Bergdahl, computer network operations, cyber attack, cyberattack, Islamic State, NBA, NDAA, Niger, political question doctrine, Smith v. Trump, standing, Travel Ban, Unlawful Command Influence, War Powers Resolution, WPR

This week Professors Chesney and Vladeck start with a close look at Smith v. Trump, a case that seeks a judicial ruling on whether the Islamic State really falls within the scope of the 2001 AUMF. …

• Uncategorized

Episode 41: Han Shot First

• October 17, 2017
• Tagged as: AC/DC Act, ACLU v. Mattis, active cyber defense, Active Cyber Defense Certainty Act, Articles of State Responsibility, beacons, Councilman Abstention, countermeasures, D Order, Electronic Communications Privacy Act, Enemy Combatant, extraterritoriality, Greedo, Guantanamo, hackback, Han Solo, Iraq, Ireland, ISIS, Islamic State, judicial deference, legal ethics, Microsoft, Military Commissions, Nashiri, national security, National Security Law, nerding out, Rogue One, Solo, Star Wars, Stored Communications Act, Supreme Court, surveillance, Travel Ban, Travel Ban 3.0, Trump, warrant

If you were unsure about whether your hosts are geeks, this episode will help settle the question.  But before we get to what Professors Chesney and Vladeck think they know but don’t really, here’s the…